Connect with us


Twitter says removal of fake accounts does not hurt user metrics




(Reuters) – Twitter Inc <TWTR.N> said on Monday it has removed fake accounts but that does not impact its reported user metrics as was indicated in a report by The Washington Post.

The newspaper had said the social media company had suspended more than 70 million fake accounts in May and June, leading to a decline of monthly active users in the second quarter.


“Most accounts we remove are not included in our reported metrics as they have not been active on the platform for 30 days or more, or we catch them at sign up and they are never counted,” CFO Ned Segal tweeted on Monday.

“If we removed 70M accounts from our reported metrics, you would hear directly from us.”

(Reporting by Munsif Vengattil in Bengaluru; Editing by Arun Koyyur)



The artist as an algorithm: robot-made Rembrandt for sale




By Michaela Cabrera


PARIS (Reuters) – Robots can do many of the jobs previously performed by humans, but could they ever replace artists?

A team of French entrepreneurs who believe so have written a computer algorithm that can create original paintings with some resemblance to works by Old Masters such as Rembrandt.

The pictures of an imagined “Baron of Belamy” and his aristocratic relations have a smudgy, blurred finish that would not have impressed Rembrandt’s clients, but are good enough for the auction house Christie’s to put one of them on sale in New York in October with a price estimate of $7,000 to $10,000.

“We are artists with a different type of paintbrush. Our paintbrush is an algorithm developed on a computer,” said Hugo Caselles-Dupre, a computer engineer who founded the group with childhood friends Gauthier Vernier and Pierre Fautrel, who both have a business background.

The artworks are created by the Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), an algorithm that learns to generate new images by being fed a database of existing paintings – 15,000 portraits in the case of the “Belamy” pictures.

“The visual is not the only thing that comprises the final portrait,” said Fautrel.

“All of the message, and the artistic process to get to the visual, are also important, even more than the final product,” he said, admitting that GAN’s pictures — printed onto canvas and then framed — are fuzzy.

“The fact that it’s not yet perfect, I think is logical because it’s a technology that is still very new, and to have very good results, we need significant calculating power, that for now we don’t have in this small apartment.”

The trio sold “The Count of Belamy” for around $10,000 to Paris-based collector Nicolas Laugero-Lasserre.

“What was astonishing was that they knew nothing about art, nothing at all,” Laugero-Lasserre said.

“In the beginning, I took them for crazy people. And finally, are they crazy, are they genius? We’ll see,”

Some artists are unconvinced that a machine can make real art.

“If there was no anger from Picasso, ‘Guernica’ would never have existed. If Modigliani were not in love with his models, his nudes would be dull and uninteresting,” said painter Robert Prestigiacomo.

“There’s always a feeling behind a painting, always – whether it’s anger, yearning, desire. And artificial intelligence is – well, you have the word ‘artificial’ in it – there you have it!”

(Editing by Robin Pomeroy)





Prev postNext post

Continue Reading


Chinese police arrest 21 over data theft at Alibaba’s delivery arm: Xinhua




HONG KONG (Reuters) – Chinese police on Friday arrested 21 suspects in connection with the theft of customer information from Alibaba Group Holding’s logistics affiliate Cainiao Network, state news agency Xinhua reported.


More than 10 million pieces of client data – including user names, phone numbers and parcel tracking numbers – were stolen from Cainiao, which provides logistics support to Alibaba’s Taobao e-commerce platform, the report said.

The agency said that police in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, had been told by the logistics company in June that barcode scanners used in its distribution stations had been infected with malware.

The security breach had now been fixed, Cainiao told Xinhua.

In a statement, Cainiao said it had detected a suspicious malware infection in some of the parcel scanners used by its logistics partners earlier this year and immediately reported the findings to the police and upgraded its systems.

It said a police investigation determined that none of the illegally obtained data had been shared with any third parties.

“Cainiao views protection of customer data as its highest priority and will continue its robust efforts to keep its platform secure,” it added.

(Reporting by Meg Shen; Editing by David Goodman)


Continue Reading


Google CEO Sundar Pichai denies efforts to tweak search results: Axios




(Reuters) – Google’s Chief Executive Sundar Pichai denied reports of efforts to politically bias the company’s internet search results, Axios reported on Friday citing a memo.

The Wall Street Journal citing internal emails reported on Thursday that the company’s staff discussed ways to alter search functions to counter the Trump administration’s 2017 travel ban.


The Journal’s report said Google did not go through with the ideas that were brainstormed.

According to Axios, Pichai wrote an email to “Googlers” saying an internal email to suggest the company would compromise the integrity of its search results for a political end were “absolutely false”.

“It’s important to me that our internal culture continues to reinforce our mission to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. Recent news stories reference an internal email to suggest that we would compromise the integrity of our search results for a political end,” Pichai was quoted as saying by Axios.

Google was not immediately available for comment.

(Reporting by Philip George in Bengaluru)



Continue Reading


FCC chairman ramps up defense of net neutrality repeal




By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – With a federal appeals court preparing to consider the Trump administration’s reversal of Obama-era U.S. net neutrality regulations, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission is ramping up his defense of the decision.


FCC Chairman Ajit Pai has this month also criticized California’s legislature for approving a state measure to guarantee open internet access and said “bad behavior” on the part of internet service providers (ISPs) could be prevented by the FCC’s new transparency requirements.

The FCC voted 3-2 in December to reverse the Obama era rules that barred internet service providers from blocking or throttling traffic or offering paid fast lanes, also known as paid prioritization. FCC repeal of the 2015 net neutrality rules was a win for ISPs Comcast Corp, AT&T Inc and Verizon Communications Inc, whose practices faced significant government oversight.

In August, 22 states and a coalition of trade groups representing companies including Alphabet Inc, Facebook Inc and Inc urged a federal appeals court to reinstate the rules.

The court has not yet scheduled oral arguments.

The U.S. Senate voted in May to reinstate the net neutrality rules, but the measure is unlikely to be approved by the House of Representatives and the White House also opposes it.

Under President Donald Trump, the FCC handed ISPs sweeping new powers to recast how Americans use the internet, as long as they disclose changes. The new rules took effect in June but providers have made no changes in access.

Pai said Thursday “if an ISP starts blocking lawful content, everyone will know. If an ISP starts throttling services based on the nature of the content, everyone will know. This is a powerful disincentive for bad behavior.”

Last December, the FCC’s net neutrality repeal sought to preempt state internet rules. Pai criticized California’s state legislature for approving net neutrality but Governor Jerry Brown, a Democrat, has not yet disclosed a position on the measure and has until Sept. 30 to decide whether to sign it.

Pai called California’s legislation “a radical, anti-consumer Internet regulation bill that would impose restrictions even more burdensome than those adopted by the FCC in 2015.”

California State Senator Scott Wiener, one of the bill’s sponsors, responded that Pai “abdicated his responsibility to ensure an open internet … Unlike Pai’s FCC, California isn’t run by the big telecom and cable companies.”

On Thursday, Pai criticized big tech companies including Twitter and Google, as “completely unregulated, which is fine, except that they’ve also been badgering the FCC and the federal government to heavily regulate their rivals.”

(Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Dave Gregorio)



Continue Reading


As new iPhones go on sale, studies reveal chips from Intel and Toshiba




By Stephen Nellis


SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – Apple Inc’s <AAPL.O> latest iPhones hit stores around the world on Friday, featuring components made by Intel Corp <INTC.O> and Toshiba <6502.T> among others, according to two firms that cracked open the iPhone Xs and Xs Max models.

The studies by repair firm iFixit and chip analysis firm TechInsights, published this week, are among the first detailed teardowns of the phones, which reviews suggested were a subtle upgrade from the tenth anniversary iPhone X.

Supplying parts for Apple’s iPhones is considered a coup for chipmakers and other manufacturers. While Apple publishes a broad list of suppliers each year, it does not disclose which companies make which components and insists its suppliers keep quiet.

That makes teardowns the only way of establishing the breakdown of parts in the phones, although analysts also recommend caution in drawing conclusions because Apple sometimes uses more than one supplier for a part. What is found in one iPhone may not be found in others.

Apple could not immediately be reached for comment.

The breakdowns listed no parts from Samsung <005930.KS> and no chips from Qualcomm Inc <QCOM.O>.

Samsung in the past has supplied memory chips for Apple’s iPhones and was believed by analysts to be the sole supplier of the costly displays for last year’s iPhone X.

Qualcomm has been a supplier of components to Apple for years, but the two have been locked in a wide-ranging legal dispute in which Apple has accused Qualcomm of unfair patent licensing practices.

U.S.-based Qualcomm, the world’s largest mobile phone chipmaker, has in turn accused Apple of patent infringement.

Qualcomm said in July that Apple intended to solely use “competitor’s modems” in its next iPhone release.

The iFixit teardown showed iPhone Xs and Xs Max used Intel’s modem and communication chips instead of Qualcomm’s hardware.

The latest iPhones also had DRAM and NAND memory chips from Micron Technology <MU.O> and Toshiba, according to iFixit’s study. Previous teardowns of the iPhone 7 had shown DRAM chips made by Samsung in some models.

TechInsights’ dissection of a 256-gigabyte storage capacity iPhone Xs Max, on the other hand, revealed DRAM from Micron but NAND memory from SanDisk, which is owned by Western Digital Corp <WDC.O> and works with Toshiba for its supply of NAND chips.

Toshiba’s chip unit Toshiba Memory was purchased by a private equity-led consortium earlier this year that Apple joined.

In the past, TechInsights found Apple used different DRAM and NAND suppliers in the same generation of phones.

“For memory – Apple obviously competes with Samsung and wants to reduce their reliance as much as possible – so totally consistent that we’d see Toshiba for NAND flash storage and Micron for DRAM,” Morningstar analyst Abhinav Davuluri said.

Jim Morrison, vice president of TechInsights, said in an interview that it appeared that one of Dialog Semiconductor’s <DLGS.DE> chips had been replaced in the iPhone Xs Max by one of Apple’s own chips, but it was not yet known whether that also applied to the iPhone Xs.

Dialog declined to comment. In May, the company said Apple had cut orders for its chips.

IFixit and TechInsights technicians also found components from companies including Skyworks Solutions <SWKS.O>, Broadcom <AVGO.O>, Murata <6981.T>, NXP Semiconductors <NXPI.O>, Cypress Semiconductor <CY.O>, Texas Instruments <TXN.O> and STMicroelectronics <STM.BN>.

(Reporting by Stephen Nellis in San Francisco, additional reporting by Arjun Panchadar, Sonam Rai and Munsif Vengattil in Bengaluru; editing by Rosalba O’Brien and Phil Berlowitz)


Continue Reading


Farfetch tops price range in IPO in boon to luxury market




By Sarah White and Melissa Fares


PARIS/NEW YORK (Reuters) – Farfetch <FTCH.N> priced its shares above its targeted range on Friday in a New York flotation that values the online luxury retailer at over $5.8 billion and underscores how big a bet web sales have become for high-end brands.

E-commerce is emerging as one of the biggest growth drivers for luxury labels initially fearful of diluting their image by selling online.

London-based Farfetch – a 10-year-old site that connects shoppers to hundreds of boutiques and fashion labels but carries no inventory – is one of a clutch of rapidly-expanding multi-brand platforms that got an early foothold in the market.

The company’s shares were trading as much as 39 percent above its initial public offering at $20 per share on the New York stock exchange on Friday – surpassing the range of $17 to $19 that already had been increased.

It will raise $885 million in the listing, with the company issuing 33.6 million new shares and existing shareholders, including early backers such as Advent Venture Partners and Vitrurian Partners, selling 10.6 million.

The IPO values Farfetch, founded by Portuguese entrepreneur Jose Neves, at $5.8 billion according to the share count available in its latest filings. When including employee share options this would rise to $6.3 billion, the company said.

Existing Farfetch investors include <JD.O>, China’s second largest e-commerce firm, which bought extra shares along the listing in a private placement.

The flotation comes at a time of growing competition among independent online fashion retailers and luxury groups rolling out their e-commerce operations, including cash-rich luxury heavyweights like Louis Vuitton owner LVMH <LVMH.PA>, which is experimenting with its own multi-brand site.

Richemont <CFR.S>, the Swiss conglomerate that owns jeweler Cartier, this year took control of now delisted Farfetch rival Yoox Net-A-Porter, in a deal that valued that platform at 5.3 billion euros ($6.2 billion).

Farfetch – which has never turned a profit, but posted a 59 percent jump in revenues last year to $386 million – drew investment from prominent industry players in its IPO, like the Pinault family that controls Kering <PRTP.PA>, the French group behind brands such as Italy’s Gucci.

To stand out from the crowd, the platform is investing heavily in technology, including for digital store services it is trialing with France’s Chanel, one of Farfetch’s big name tie-ups.

“It is an industry that, rightly so, chooses their path and their channels very carefully,” said Farfetch Chief Executive Jose Neves, adding that, for most luxury retailers, it is all about brand image, aesthetic and high-end customer service.

“But I think the industry has seen the potential of reaching key demographics like the new millennial customer that thinks digital first. These customers are online – they’re not offline.”

Online sales are set to make up a quarter of the luxury industry’s revenues by 2025 from just under 10 percent now, according to consultancy Bain, thanks in part to demand from young shoppers in tech-savvy markets like China.

($1 = 0.8493 euros)

“That is an incremental $100 billion opportunity just in online luxury fashion,” Neves said. “This is Chapter 2. We want to be a category leader and we want to continue to gain massive share in this space,” Neves said.

(Reporting by Sarah White in Paris and Melissa Fares in New York; editing by Keith Weir and Diane Craft)


Continue Reading


Stay Updated

Most Popular